How is christopher lee related to charlemagne

This judgment text has undergone conversion so that it is mobile and web-friendly. This may have created formatting or alignment issues. Please refer to the PDF copy for a print-friendly version. He was attached to the Faculty of Law. The six acts of gratification were as follows:. He was released from prison on home detention on 17 September He completed his home detention on 5 October I understand from the Prosecution that the appellant has paid the penalties.

Christopher lee family tree

This provision shifts the evidential burden of proof to an accused person when certain conditions are satisfied;. I begin by setting out the relevant provisions in this case. Where in any proceedings against a person for an offence under section 5 or 6, it is proved that any gratification has been paid or given to or received by a person in the employment of the Government or any department thereof or of a public body by or from a person or agent of a person who has or seeks to have any dealing with the Government or any department thereof or any public body, that gratification shall be deemed to have been paid or given and received corruptly as an inducement or reward as hereinbefore mentioned unless the contrary is proved.

The explanatory statement of the bill for the Singapore Prevention of Corruption Ordinance Ordinance No 39 of which is the predecessor of the Act states that a number of provisions in the Malayan Ordinance have been incorporated in the bill. The second to fourth elements set out at [12] concern the mens rea. Thus, the context of the gift is important.

In Yuen Chun Yii , the court found that the nature of the relationship between the recipient and the giver, as well as the apparent intention of the giver, was part of the context which allowed it to make a finding that the recipient could not have had the necessary mens rea. The third element relates to whether that act was objectively dishonest in the entire transaction.